When it comes to Creo vs Fusion 360, this capability alone blows Fusion 360 out of the water. Model-Based design is truly the future of engineering, and no other solution has capabilities as advanced as those in Creo. For example, they can quickly analyze tradeoffs in design decisions, adjust component specifications, or make choices that optimize performance while meeting budget goals. It also helps engineers to design better products. As a result, product changes are communicated instantly, helping to reduce or eliminate rework and scrap. Production workers work directly from the current model, rather than relying on redlined manufacturing or assembly drawings. This helps speed up market time, reduces product costs, and eliminates errors and delays. MBD means capturing and conveying information about a product within the 3D model design, eliminating the need to create additional manufacturing drawings. Model-based definition (MBD) or model-based engineering is the hottest advance in the design world in years. This helps to reduce the cost of design and reduces the overall time to market while helping to optimize product specifications.įusion 360 has simulation capabilities, but using the functionality requires working with simplified models. SimulationĬreo includes state-of-the-art simulation capabilities that enable your team to analyze design performance without the need for physical prototypes. Therefore, if your manufacturing company operates in one of these industries, you will find Creo a better choice because of the depth of the product in these industries. PTC also has referenceable customers in each area who will vouch for the product’s capabilities. Creo Industry ExpertiseĬreo has functionality for the unique needs of manufacturing companies: Industry expertise should be near the top of your list when deciding between Creo vs Fusion 360. Plus, while Creo does include upgrades and add-ons, the essential tools required to do most functions are included in the base package. Extensions include such seemingly necessary capabilities as machining, nesting, fabrication, data management, additive manufacturing, generative design, etc.Ĭreo benefits from PTC’s long history in manufacturing and has specific capabilities and expertise in a wide range of industries. However, many necessary functions require the purchase and installation of specific extensions, negating any price advantage Fusion 360 brings to the table. However, it does not have as prescriptive access rules.Įnabling non-CAD-users to access designs is crucial for modern manufacturers.įusion 360 has a strong manufacturing focus in machining, electronics, and PCB design and layout. It does enable users to interact with designs even if they are not CAD users, which is a key capability. In addition, each user can have read, write, or view privileges to each document separately, so you never have to worry about theft of your IP.įusion 360 has a similar approach, although not quite as robust as Creo. Each project can have its own secure workspace, and the workspaces can be open to internal or external stakeholders, including customers and suppliers. PTC Creo is designed for global organizations and geographically dispersed teams. In this instance of Creo vs Fusion 360, Creo comes out ahead. But for occasional tasks or infrequent users, it also has built-in guidance and workflows that help the user navigate a task to completion. In addition, occasional users might find it confusing as they feel like they have to learn a new UI every time they log in.Įase of use is a key criterion for selecting a CAD system if you have occasional or external users.Ĭreo is also available in a browser or through a device application, and it has a familiar user interface regardless of the access method. It will also take some additional time to get up to speed whenever a designer approaches a task that they don’t often encounter. The unique user interface isn’t hard to understand, but even the minor differences mean it does take time to learn. It doesn’t follow established desktop conventions, nor does it follow established browser conventions. The user interface is similar across all access methods, but it is non-standard. It’s also available on PCs and Chromebooks. Fusion 360 is available through any browser, so it’s accessible from anywhere at any time. One of the essential criteria in streamlining the design process is the ease of use of the CAD system. Creo vs SolidEdge Creo vs Fusion 360 Comparison Criteria: Ease of Use

Inventor vs fusion 360